Groupthink, Social Proof, and the Dangers of Running in Crowds

This past year has been crazy for sure. Train wreck after train wreck, America is coming apart at the seems. Or at least what it seems like to me. This past week, we had one of the craziest things happen (according to politicians and new media) in the history of our country. A group of right-wing activists rallied in Washington DC to protest the results of the Presidential Election. The way everything played out was fairly bizarre for sure, but was it really that surprising?

It was in the news and on social media that a large group of people were planning on protesting the certification of Joe Biden's win over Donald Trump. This massive group of Republicans believed that the election had been rigged and that the results giving Biden a massive win over Trump was fraudulent. That morning, I called a work colleague that I discuss politics with a lot and told him, "Watch, something's going to go down today. These are those extreme Trump supporters that would follow him into the fires of hell. They're gonna have guns, they're gonna do something stupid, and it's gonna get crazy." Not to brag, but HOLY SHIT was I right!

Just like clockwork, the protestors escalated their behavior until they had swarmed the steps of the Capitol and soon after, broke inside and threw some papers around. Overall, I was super disappointed. I mean, if you're gonna go through all that effort, at least bring guns with you and make it a show. These guys that made it in pretty much just trashed the place, stole a few trinkets/memorabilia, and broke some windows. In my mind, it was a pretty weak castle storming if I'm being honest. 

 Whether the "Storming of the Capitol" was a silly little protest that got momentarily out of hand, or an armed insurrection, the real question is: How did a group of people who were so vocally against the Floyd George protests, and the riots that ensued, turn into a seething mob ready to tear shit up? 

Groupthink

The answer is a psychological mystery known as "groupthink". The basic idea is that people tend to adopt beliefs and behavior of other people in a group that they are a member of. By doing this, a member of the group reduces the chances of quarrels with other members, or from being ostracized  from the group for committing what George Orwell called "Thought Crime." Groupthink is dangerous on many levels because it quite often lead to beliefs that are illogical or just simply absurd. The need for people to maintain harmony within the group will cause an individual, who may be intelligent and rational on their own, to act in ways that don't don't necessarily align with their personal values. 

People have been studying groupthink, or crowd psychology, since the late 1800s. Gustave Le Bon was a french philosopher, economist, and psychologist who published The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind in 1895. He believed that when a person became part of a group or crowd, their sense of personal identity was replaced with the identity of the group. The group creates a certain level of anonymity that allows a persons subconscious mind to take over from the rational, conscious mind. 

Since Le Bon, groupthink, or crowd psychology has been the subject of a lot of controversy, primarily because it is extremely difficult to conduct studies. However, one thing that seems to be clear is that people in groups can very easily be persuaded to act however the perceived leaders of the group instruct them too. Martin Luther King once said that, "Riots are the language of the unheard." However, as an advocate of peaceful protest, he led 250,000 people in the March on Washington with the Washington DC police reporting no incidents of violence or mayhem occurring during the event. 

The Dangers of Following the Herd

One theme that pops up in my head over and over is the idea of social proof. Social proof is the idea that a person can use the knowledge of others to save them from having to go through the work of having to spend the mental effort of collecting information and coming to a conclusion themselves. One of my favorite examples of this is found in the Pick-up Artist Community. In the book, the Mystery Method, the author suggests that, if trying to pick up a girl at a bar, it's always best to bring one or two female friends along for the night. Having other women around you signals to other females that you have already been deemed non-threatening and thus, safe to talk to. 

However, it's easy to see how this strategy can easily be abused. And it is abused on a regular basis by marketers and other people who want to influence people. Testimonials and reviews are used to convince would-be customers that a certain product is a worthy purchase. Shoe companies pay famous athletes to endorse their products, authors pay other successful authors to write a review for their book cover, and on nearly every single Amazon product page, you can find a list of reviews by customers who praise the product. 

The social proof concept is the foundation of the groupthink phenomenon. While some members of the group are more leader types, others are followers and look to the other people in the group for behavior signals. In the case of riots or the events at the Capitol this past week, it usually only takes one or two of the "leaders" to begin acting in a certain way and others will soon begin the same behavior. "Well if these guys are doing it, it must be okay for me to do it." This hardly ever turns out good. 

A major problem with groupthink is that certain ideas spread throughout the group regardless of if they are good ideas or not. In my opinion, perhaps one of the most dangerous ideas being spread throughout conservative groups is the Covid-19 virus is "just the flu." In this case, people may know someone that had Covid but recovered quickly, and so they use this as "evidence" that it's not as bad as everyone is making it out to be. Ignoring the scientific data and the alarming death rates, this group is fighting tooth-and-nail the safety measures implemented by state governments. The interesting part of this is that the believers and non-believers can, for the most part, be identified strictly by their political affiliation. This is true not just with Covid-19, but man-made climate crisis and other social issues. 

Avoiding Groupthink

Humans are, by nature, social animals. Living within a society provides us many benefits including safety and companionship. Every part of our biology and psychology evolved to help us live longer and our susceptibility to groupthink is no different. For example, say you were out hunting with members of your tribe when suddenly, several of them begin running your way with frightened expressions on their faces. Instead of having to wait to see what they're all running from, and potentially becoming a victim of an angry bear or lion, you can make the quick decision to simply turn-tail and flee as well.

While it's easy to see how groupthink was beneficial to our hunter-gatherer ancestors, it's not as useful to us in our modern society. In fact, I would say that it's more harmful than good. I recently read a story about a man who refused to believe in the dangers of Covid-19. His social media was full of anti-mask and anti-vaccine posts. Within a couple months of the initial outbreak, both his mother and father had contracted Covid and passed away within weeks of each other. 

Trying to fight against our own instincts is incredibly difficult. Having an opinion that differs from the group often leads to hostility and sometimes even violence. So how does one avoid falling into the pitfalls of groupthink? The first step is, of course, to be aware of your participation. If you find yourself holding a strong opinion about something, ask yourself, "Is this opinion my own?" 

For years, I was a hard-core laissez faire capitalist. I held strong beliefs against taxation and social programs and felt that each person was in charge of their own destiny. When I sat back and did a little self-reflection on it though, I realized that the only reason I had these beliefs was because I had read Atlas Shrugged and that when I would discuss Ayn Rand's ideas with my conservative family, I would get validation and approval. Once I began my own study of sociology and biological evolution, I began to see the error of my thought process and set out to form a philosophy that made sense to me. One of the things I make sure to do though, is to keep my opinions to myself, especially when I know that they may be considered controversial. As Robert Greene writes in the 48 Laws of Power, "Think as you like, but behave like others." 

As I've said time and time again, the best thing you can do for yourself is to educate yourself. Challenge your beliefs, ask questions, and find trustworthy primary sources of information to help you form a view that is independent of the group. 

The easiest way to avoid groupthink is to avoid the groups. Especially social media. Social media sites like Facebook and Instagram can be giant echo chambers. People tend to surround themselves with other like minded individuals and so they tend to feed off each other and support whatever ideas happen to make their way in. If someone happens to post a comment that doesn't fit the groups beliefs, they are blasted to hell with a whole barrage of insults. I recently deleted my Facebook profile and all political memes and posts from my Instagram account. Since then, I feel like by not participating in these online debates and discussions, I'm free to hold any view I want. It's really quite liberating. 

Accepting Things the Way They Are

For good or for worse, the human race has evolved into what it is currently. As much as I want to be mad about certain aspects of it, it doesn't really do anyone any good. We're currently living in an age where free speech is under attack. Say the wrong thing in front of the wrong person or make a slightly controversial post, and you can quickly find yourself with a bloody nose or without a job. For me, I choose the path of least resistance. I try to stay away from discussing ideas with people that I know subscribe to rigid set of beliefs. These never turn out well and quite frankly, they're draining. 

There will always be folks who follow the herd and there will always be lunatics to lead them. Do yourself a favor and just let them do their think, keep your head down, and try to live the best life you can.

More Notes on Education

    

America is not as great of a country as we like to think it is. In fact, we’re not even in the top 10 of great countries to live in. Why is that? In a word: education. Or, if you live in America, the lack of an education. Don’t get offended yet, I’m fixin to educate you on the problem of education in America. 

    In a worldwide study on literacy, the United States comes in at a staggering #25 for people over the age of 15 who can read and write a simple sentence about daily life. That means countries like Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, South Korea, and the Bahamas have a higher percentage of people that can read than the U.S. But wait! This is just people who can read and write a basic sentence. According to the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, only 79% of Americans “have English literacy skills sufficient to complete tasks that require comparing and contrasting information, paraphrasing, or making low-level inferences.” That means that 21% of Americans cannot read a book or informative article and effectively glean information from it. 

    So America is full of idiots, right? If that’s the case, how is it possible that the U.S. is fourth for the amount of money she spends on each student - about $16,500 per student, per year. (Note: this is significantly lower than the approximately $80,000 per year we spend housing a prison inmate). According to the numbers, there are countries that spend half as much per student, who are getting far better results. Many of these countries also have cheaper, better healthcare, lower crime rates, and lower suicide and depression rates. Hmmm...I wonder if there’s a correlation there. 

    Why is this information important? Because we’re supposed to be the greatest country in the world, at least according to the indoctrination camp often referred to as the public education system. Wouldn’t the greatest country in the world have a population who is smart, educated, and intelligent? Well, no. That wouldn’t do at all. If we had a population who was well educated, it would be a lot more difficult for the people in power to keep us under their thumb. But we’ll get to that in just a minute. When I speak of education, I’m not only referring to the time spent in public schools or a four-year university. Hell, 40% of American adults have a four-year college degree and a huge percentage of those people still can’t fucking read. 

    When I speak of education, I’m referring to the constant growth of one’s mind. The constant flow of new information that comes from books and articles from reputable sources. And no, CNN, Facebook, and the New York Times do not count as reputable sources. If you get your information from memes, or blog posts disguised as legitimate news sources, you may just be an idiot. In his book Trust Me I’m Lying, Ryan Holiday discusses his job as a media manipulator. He describes how online news articles are not held to the same legal standards as print news articles are. In fact, many of these “news” blogs can publish absolute bullshit online without any repercussions, even if the information is completely fabricated. 

    Also, beware of a little something called “confirmation bias.” Most of us have a set of beliefs that are based on the political beliefs of our parents before us. When you are having an online debate with a total stranger about a topic you feel strongly about, you may be tempted to jump on Google and look for something that might support your position. Chances are, you’ll find an opinion article that skews statistics in a way that will confirm what you already believe to be true. At the same time, you will likely ignore information that contradicts what you already believe to be true. This is called confirmation bias. It’s a consequence of arbitrarily choosing your beliefs before you’ve actually done any homework. Do yourself a favor, no matter how uncomfortable it might make you feel, read some information that contradicts what you believe. Look at statistics that might prove yourself wrong. Be open minded and allow yourself to truly learn. 

    Now, getting back to our uneducated population. Why is it that, despite spending so much on education, are we as a nation still stupid? Surprisingly, it’s not very complicated. The people (politicians, billionaires, and billionaire politicians) don’t want an educated population. If everyone were educated, and we wouldn’t need their brilliance to save us and lead us, now would we? I work as an electrical construction foreman. When I was first being trained as a foreman, I would often get frustrated that some of the other guys didn’t understand what I was asking of them. My boss at the time laughed and said, “If they could all think like us, they wouldn’t need us.” How true is this when it comes to our government. If we didn’t need our politicians, how would they take advantage of us. 

    The entire political system was created by a group of extremely wealthy landowners, and highly intelligent politicians. We’re often taught that the framers of the constitution were a bunch of rebels and everyday Joes. But that’s not the case at all. No, they were super rich, and developed a system of government that would keep them in power, and keep them rich for centuries to come. By the way, do you know who the richest U.S. President was? George Washington. He owned so much land and had so much money that he made these other presidents look like a bunch of chumps. Same thing with all the other Framers. Rich, white men. I know what you’re thinking, “That’s bullshit. Would they do that?” Simple, to ensure better lives for them and their offspring. Duh! 

    Yes, they put things in the Constitution like “Freedom of the Press” and “Freedom of Speech” but what good does that do when they own the press and can easily discredit anyone who uses speech in a way that doesn’t jive with the narrative? Think I’m joking? Ben Franklin’s contribution to the Constitution is immeasurable. He also was the editor and publisher of the Pennsylvania Gazette. Man, it must be really difficult to gain public support for your agenda when you control the only information the public gets, huh? 

    At this point, you may be asking yourself, “But Rollie, if this is true, wouldn’t they want to stop any competing information from coming out?” Right you are, Kent! And they have created a genius way of doing that. Several ways, actually. First, they have competing news channels and papers. One side represents the political left, the other represents the political right. When information makes it out that those in power don’t want to be out, they simply make sure that both sides claim it to be untrue. “Hey those guys are both calling it bullshit, it must be bullshit.” This works for discrediting news stories as well as information sources. The second way they do this is to make sure the news never sees the light of day. One phone call from the head honcho and the story disappears forever. Or, in the case of Facebook or Twitter, you just create an algorithm that filters out any posts or ads that conflict with the message you want your customers to hear. A third way is to ignore it. American’s have a short attention span. We’re so concerned with our devices and our streaming TV and distractions of every sort, that if negative information about our country does make it past the filters, it doesn’t lodge itself into our long-term memory. We’ll just forget it and it goes away. Some recent examples are immigrant kids in cages, the Black Lives Matters movement, and President Elect Joe Biden being a fucking pedophile. Oh, and fourth way they discredit information is to simply label something as a “conspiracy theory.” Oh don’t listen to that guy, he’s just a nutso who believes in conspiracy theories. For the record, there have been an astonishing amount of conspiracy theories that turned out to be true. But don’t take my word for it, get out and see for yourself. 

    Here’s a little bit of advice, if someone is offering you an abundance of information about something and you didn’t ask for it, they’re probably selling something. The “freedom of the press” and all the crap that comes with it is just a way for the powerfully rich folks to sell you the idea that you’re free. 

    
    But wait a minute, Rollie! Doesn’t that mean you are trying to sell me something? Again, right you are. I want to sell you back your own lives. I want you to get out there and educate yourself so that you can see what you’re missing out on. The point is, ladies and gentlemen, is that we can all live better, more fulfilling lives. We don’t need a government to decide how this happens. For tens of thousands of years, civilizations existed where people lived peacefully among each other and all their needs were met. Each and every one of us has the power, socked away in the little eight pound lump of goo between our ears, to create a better world. But, as the great Buddha once said, “Don’t take it from me. Go out and find the truth for yourself. “ or something like that.

Communism is Retarded

So I've been spending some time reading up on communism the past couple days after seeing a few Facebook posts showing that there are in fact people in the U.S. who support the rise of communism. My initial reaction was, "what the fuck is wrong with these kids?" However that was quickly replaced with the though, "these kids are fucking retarded, spoiled little babies." And I say this with the utmost respect. 

Growing up in the 80's and 90's, I got to see the tail end of the Cold War. We were taught about the U.S.S.R in school by our teachers. I remember learning about the wide-spread poverty, the inability of citizens to own things, and the absolute misery of the people living under this form of government. See, the basic premise of communism is that the state (or the public) owns everything as a whole and people are paid not by what they produce but by what they need. In other words, someone born with a disability will receive the same monthly benefits as a healthy person who is able to work. 

The idea is pretty simple. Everything in the country is owned by "the State", or in other words, the people. Seems pretty cool right? I mean, it theory it does seem kinda cool right? It's a system designed so that no citizen ever needs to worry because the State has your back. Even as a hard-core capitalist, I can see the allure. But I'm not a fucking idiot.

 People who believe that this system will lead to prosperity for all have clearly not done their homework. Their rallying cry of "true communism has never been tried" implies that communism in it's purest form would yield incredible benefits to society as a whole. If you are one of these dipshits, please do some research.

First of all, I encourage you to follow the idea of "from each according to their ability, to each according to their need" to it's logical conclusion. In a society where you are rewarded simply for existing, where would the drive come to better yourself? If no matter how hard you worked, your paycheck was the same as the druggy around the corner, how long would you continue to work hard? My guess is not very long. Even in our current system of representative democracy, our dollars are taken by force and given to whoever the government deems worthy. 

In an interview with Larry King, Neil DeGrasse Tyson points out that if we were to live forever, our drive to do anything would be minimal because as he states, "there's always tomorrow." I think the same holds true for a communist society. If no matter how hard you work you always get the same, where is the incentive to kick ass? I feel like you'd just be tempted to lay around like a fat piece of shit. 

The real problem with modern communism is that people haven't done their homework. Supporters believe that they can just vote their way to a socialist system but even Lenin knew that wasn't gonna work. His idea was to create a revolution under a strong leader (dictator), and then once they won, this strong leader would relinquish his authority to create a true socialist state. Yeah fucking right. We're fucking animals for crying out loud. It's in our genetic makeup to seek and maintain every bit of power we can, and as we all know, absolute power corrupts absolutely. There was no way anyone was gonna just hand the reins of the country over to the people. That's just bad politics. 

Perhaps the biggest difference that I see in previous communist attempts and this current movement in the U.S. is that in the countries where it really took hold, the people that were pushing for it were the Labor Parties. People who were producing and working while the ruling elite cashed in. In the United States however, the people preaching communism are lazy fucktards who want something for nothing. They want a piece of the rich people's pie without having to do anything at all. They want handouts, they want freebies, and they want an easy, plush life. Newsflash, morons! No one who's lived under communist rule as ever had a plush life. 

So the question I would like to pose to communism supporters is, how many deaths are acceptable to you to achieve your goal? A million? Two million? It's estimated that nearly 6-8 million died in the Russian Revolution, some estimates reaching up to 61 million by the end of the Stalin era. And that's just in Russia. It's interesting to me that people can support a system that necessarily requires the death of all opposition. Where, in all this murdering, is the community taken into account? In these countries that tried communism, it's pretty obvious that it was a ploy by a few smart individuals to gain total control of the stupid people for their own benefit. 

In examining communism, I've come to the conclusion that anyone who supports it is a bumbling idiot. First of all, if you want more, work more. Second, if your belief system requires the death of ANYONE, you are a piece of shit. But yeah, let's go back to that shit. I think you'll find that in America, there will never be enough support for it to actually happen, yet it's still incredibly scary to know that there are still these types of people roaming this planet. 

Why Don't Millennials Have Manners?

I guess this is just what happens when you get old. You start seeing the generations after you as a bunch of sniveling, entitled assholes - a whole generation of kids who think the world owes them something. Now, I'm not saying that all kids growing up in today's world are mental, but there sure are a lot of them.

I think it's the mouths on these arrogant little fucks. When I was coming up, there was always the threat of getting your ass whooped if you ran your mouth. At the same time though, if you ran your mouth, you were expected to back it up. In today's world, kids can say whatever they want and be protected by the "anti-bullying" movement. My own son was EXPELLED from a school for punching a kid that kept calling my son's mom a lesbian. In what was my proudest moment as a father, my son said, "Have you ever been punched in the face for saying something someone didn't want to hear?" Now, I'm not at all suggesting violence is an answer, but I promise you that little boy watches what he says to people a little more closely.

But here's where things get ugly. As it turns out, the kid suffered from some kind of degenerative bone disease and his father was in hospice with terminal brain cancer. As sad as both of those two things are, he was shown by his parents, the school district, and the police that he can be as much of a little prick as he wanted to without any recourse because of the unfortunate circumstances surrounding him. I say FUCK THAT. It does not matter what your circumstances are! If you're a little asshole, you deserve to be punched in the face. Period.

This is the sort of behavior going around everywhere. I swear to god there are a billion more single parents in the world now and a lot less of them are because of dead beat dads. Instead, you get two parents trying to win the affection of the child through physical and emotional bribes. Our kids are growing up and thinking that if they whine hard enough to someone, they're gonna get what they want. It's absolutely retarded.

The feeling of entitlement that is prevalent in these kids stretches far past the physical. They don't just want THINGS, they want EVERYTHING. "I went to college, I deserve a job." "Oh, you two are having a conversation that I wasn't included in? Let me just interject!"

I do have faith though! There can't be a country where an entire generation does nothing. I think eventually, when the economy collapses again, these nerds are gonna learn what it means to EARN a living.

Check out Rants & Rage Episode 7 to hear more of my rants about millennials.